Gradient-enhanced spline dimensional decomposition for uncertainty quantification with limited training samples

Eunho Heo, Dongjin Lee

Abstract

A spline dimensional decomposition (SDD) surrogate effectively represents high-dimensional engineering responses with localized features and complex nonlinearities in uncertainty quantification (UQ). However, limited training data can make coefficient estimation from function values severely ill-conditioned. We propose gradient-enhanced SDD (GE-SDD), which trains the surrogate using function values and partial derivatives. A diagonal row-weight matrix balances the function and derivative blocks by their Frobenius norms. We solve the balanced system through ridge regression in probability-weighted Sobolev coordinates and select the regularization parameter using grouped K-fold cross-validation to prevent information leakage. Mapping the solution back to the L2-orthonormal SDD basis preserves closed-form mean and variance estimates. We evaluate the proposed GE-SDD on a two-dimensional continuous exponential function, a linear dynamical system with three uncertain parameters, and a 30-dimensional 25-bar truss. GE-SDD is more accurate than standard SDD and uses gradients more robustly than gradient-enhanced Kriging. GE-SDD achieves a median NRMSE of 1.022% on the nonsmooth benchmark, compared with 8.731% for Kriging. For the truss, GE-SDD yields lower NRMSE and more accurate standard-deviation estimates than Kriging at moderate training sizes and above. Overall, the benefits of gradient augmentation depend on input dimension, basis resolution, training size, and the target UQ quantity.

Disclosure

“Funding This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2025-00560781). Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process During the preparation of this work, the authors used OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude for English-language editing, grammar checking, wording refinement, and stylistic polish”

PDF page 25
Classification
Drafting limited passages
Multiplier
5
Verified

Structural counts

Pages 28 pdf
Theorems 0 pdf fallback
Lemmas 0 pdf fallback
Propositions 0 pdf fallback
Corollaries 0 pdf fallback
Definitions 0 pdf fallback
Displayed equations 134 pdf fallback
Bibliography entries 29 pdf fallback
Appendix pages 4 estimated

Count notes

  • arXiv source was unavailable; PDF-text fallbacks were used.
  • Appendix pages include the first PDF page with an explicit Appendix heading through the final page.